[Nepomuk] Re: Development status tracking

[Paweł Paprota]

Hey,

On 07/03/2011 11:41 AM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote:
> And what are the policies/guidlines of adding a project to this page ?
>

Good question - this should be stated on the page. IMHO every 
development activity (at the high level) should be reflected in the status.

If there will be too many entries, it can be split into categories 
(GSOC, refactoring, bugfixing etc.) but I think the more information the 
better.

> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Paweł Paprota<ppawel at fastmail.fm>  wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> On 07/03/2011 10:58 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>>> Just a quick "yes, please" from me. I think this is a very good idea and
>>> I would gladly track my tasks on such a page, link other information to
>>> it and blog about it.
>>>
>>
>> Good to hear!
>>
>>> Would you take the task of finishing this page? Maybe add a big fat
>>> Nepomuk logo on top? ;)
>>>
>>
>> Sure. The problem is that I don't actually know what tasks are being
>> worked on currently! This was in fact the main reason for starting the
>> tracking page.
>>
>> Moreover, the core of this idea is that the tracking will be done
>> collectively so nothing's stopping anyone from updating the status.
>>
>> I still have a few ideas on how to improve the shape and form of the
>> page itself but obviously further suggestions are welcome.
>>
>> So basically to answer your question once again - yes and what else
>> would you like to see there?
>>
>> Paweł
>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>> On 07/03/2011 09:34 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> as I'm about to start another development task in the Nepomuk project,
>>>> an idea came to my mind. I already said random things on IRC about using
>>>> Bugzilla for tracking development but I've decided to give this idea a
>>>> proper shape.
>>>>
>>>> So here is the first iteration:
>>>>
>>>> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/DevelopmentStatus
>>>>
>>>> There is enough introductory information on the page that I think
>>>> there's no need to duplicate the explanation of the idea in this e-mail.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know what you think and if it would be feasible to try to
>>>> maintain this page and see how it works (or doesn't work).
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nepomuk mailing list
>>> Nepomuk at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nepomuk mailing list
>> Nepomuk at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk