[Nepomuk] Re: nfo:Website and what it really is

[Christian Mollekopf]

On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:15:46 +0200, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:

> Recently the issue of nfo:Bookmark vs. nfo:Website came up. I voted for
> using nfo:Website only but then realized that I always had
> misinterpreted its comment:
> It states that nfo:Website is a container for remote resources such as
> nfo:RemoteDataObject. And those remote resources are interpreted as
> nfo:HtmlDocuments.
>
> Thus, we (I) always used nfo:Website wrong.
>
> Now the question is: should we correct our (my) usage and hope that
> others will not step into the trap of thinking that a Website = Webpage?
> Or should we change nfo:Website to be what we (well, me at least) always
> thought it was: a web page/web address?
>
> In other words: should we improve the comment on nfo:Website to explain
> that it is in fact not a single web page but a collection of pages
> typically accessible through one domain?
> Or should we change it to be a nie:DataObject which represents a single
> web page?
> Or should we (in addition to the first maybe) introduce another class
> nfo:Webpage which is a nie:DataObject and can be part of a nfo:Website?


Not sure if I got this right now. According to the docs an nmo:Website is
kind of the collection of htmldocuments the website is consisting of,  
which makes sense IMO.

I don't see a use in nfo:Webpage for a single htmldocument since there  
already is nfo:htmldocument, so it would be redundant.
Especially in a time where a webpage is not necessarily linked to it's own  
htmldocument anymore (javascript and co).
So I would suggest to correct the usage that an nfo:Website can be a  
collection of htmlDocuments and not just a single htmldocument.

Cheers,

Christian


>
> Cheers,
> Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomu