[Nepomuk] Loads of Questions

[Sebastian Trueg]

On 09/16/2010 07:17 PM, Richard Dale wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:
>> On 09/07/2010 12:02 PM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote:
>>> optional properties are properties that contribute to the actul score if
>>> they match, but their absence or mismatch don't decrease the actual store
>>
>> yes.
>>
>>> Sebastian, why do you prefer KUrl over QUrl ?
>>
>> It is a common guideline in KDE to prefer the KDE class over the Qt one.
>> In addition to that KUrl's constructor can handle encoded URIs and
>> KUrl::url() gives us the encoded URI as a QString. With QUrl we would
>> have to:
>>
>> QString s = QString::fromAscii( url.toEncoded() );
>> QUrl u = QUrl::fromEncoded( s.toAscii() );
>>
>> which looks ugly.
>> With KUrl this becomes:
>>
>> QString s = url.url();
>> KUrl u( s );
>>
>> nice and simple. :)
> Surely the Soprano part of Nepomuk/Soprano would be the one doing the
> most with URIs? Are you intending to keep Soprano Qt only? I assume
> that because KUrl only adds behaviour to QUrl and not extra instance
> variables or virtual methods it should be possible to cast back and
> forth between them - is that right?

yes, that is correct.

Cheers,
Sebastian