[Nepomuk] Nepomuk Core - Questions & Patches
Vishesh Handa
handa.vish at gmail.com
Wed May 26 12:52:26 CEST 2010
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 10:08 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > > 3. When checking if the the m_kickoffUri is a nie:url for a
> resource.
> > > The nieUrl is assigned to be equal to the uri. This however gets
> fixed
> > > in the load(). And nieUrl isn't used anywhere, so it doesn't
> > matter that
> > > much.
> >
> > I suppose you mean this part:
> >
> > if( it.next() ) {
> > QUrl uri = it["r"].uri();
> > if( uri.isEmpty() ) {
> > m_uri = m_kickoffUri;
> > }
> > else {
> > m_uri = uri;
> > m_nieUrl = uri;
> > }
> >
> > The last two lines. AFAICT this is perfectly fine since in the latter
> > case both nie:url and resource URI are equal.
> >
> >
> > I respectfully disagree. :)
> >
> > The query used is this "select distinct ?r ?o where { { ?r nie:url <uri>
> > . } UNION { <uri> ?p ?o . } } LIMIT 1". The case where ?r isn't empty
> > is when the <uri> contains the nie:url and therefore ?r will contain the
> > resource uri.
>
> You are of course correct. It should be "m_nieUrl = m_kickoffUri"
> instead. Agreed?
>
>
Yup. :)
If you get the time could you please look at my horrible merge patch?
Thanks
- Vishesh Handa
Cheers,
> Sebastian
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20100526/50ac31e4/attachment.htm
More information about the Nepomuk
mailing list