[Nepomuk] Nepomuk Core - Questions & Patches

Vishesh Handa handa.vish at gmail.com
Mon May 24 00:37:01 CEST 2010


Sorry forgot to attach it. I'm sleepy! :-/

- Vishesh Handa

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Vishesh Handa <handa.vish at gmail.com> wrote:

> I had forgotten to alter ResourceData's destructor and there was a minor
> problem with cleanUpCache.
>
> *End Result:* It works! The patch is horrible, and can probably be
> optimized a lot, and has horribly duplicated code, but it WORKS! So, my
> solution is a viable one. I'll clear it up tom.
>
> Btw, I think we should still merge determineUri() and load().
>
> - Vishesh Handa
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Vishesh Handa <handa.vish at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> My description was a little lousy. So, I thought I'll try it out. It
>> didn't really work, but that's probably cause my patch is faulty.
>>
>> I didn't combine both the lists. I just added extra info to them at the
>> end of determineUri. I'll check out what I did wrong tomorrow. If I can't
>> figure it out. I'll go for your method and combine determineUri() and
>> load().
>>
>> - Vishesh Handa
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20100524/7183dbfa/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: differentApproach2.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 12756 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20100524/7183dbfa/attachment.diff 


More information about the Nepomuk mailing list