[Nepomuk] Issues with non persistent filesystems/mounts and Nepomuk

Kevin Ottens ervin at kde.org
Fri Jun 4 12:58:57 CEST 2010

On Friday 4 June 2010 12:29:45 Daniel Winter wrote:
> Nepomuk generaly handles non persistent filesystems when they are
> reported by solid. (Though I believe that the transition from
> nepomuk:// to filex:// uris will take forever when you use a big
> external hdds (there are 2 TB devices these days) with lots of files.
> Solid is about hardware an NFS or bind mount is not hardware, so I am
> not sure if adding that to solid is the correct way to solve the
> issue.

Just adding some info there, we're actually broadening the focus of libsolid, 
that's in the plans for the 4.6 platform. As such libsolid will start 
reporting the NFS and smb mounts which are declared in your fstab.
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20100604/24affe60/attachment.sig 

More information about the Nepomuk mailing list