[Nepomuk] properties range and RDF literals

[Sebastian Trüg]

I agree with you. I actually think that there is not a single property
in the Nepomuk ontologies that could not have a typed literal range
(well, except for the ones that have non-literal ranges of course).
But changing that now could break backwards compatibility without any
real gain. At least I cannot think of any practical advantage to fixing
the ranges.

Cheers,
Sebastian

On 04/20/2010 04:20 PM, Evstifeev Roman wrote:
> Looking at those two properties:
> 1) nfo:fileName
>       rdfs:range <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
> 2) nao:description
>       rdfs:range <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal>
> 
> am i right, that:
> nfo:fileName here have range of typed RDF literal of type xsd:string
> nao:description have range of some RDF literal (typed or plain)
> 
> and second:
> why range of those properties are different? It seems to me, that 
> nao:description only will ever contain a string too, and range of any RDF 
> lieral is useless here. (for ex. using xsd:integer as a description is weird)
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>