[Nepomuk] [nepomuk-kde] serviceOwnerChanged usage

Sebastian Trüg trueg at kde.org
Thu Apr 8 16:43:20 CEST 2010


The patch looks perfectly fine.
The errors you encounter are due to all other services and apps missing
the storage service. While the resource manager detects that storage
went down nothing is really done about it yet...

Thanks a lot for taking care of this. :)

Cheers,
Sebastian

On 04/08/2010 03:08 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> I've done the kdelibs/nepomuk/ResourceManager class. I'd appreciate it
> if someone could verify it, as I encountered some errors. The procedure
> I used for testing was -
> $ nepomukserver
> $ qdbus org.kde.NepomukStorage /servicecontrol shutdown
> $ qdbus org.kde.NepomukServer /nepomukserver quit
> 
> On shutting down the NepomukStorage I got a couple of errors like -
> *"nepomukservicestub(8670)" Error in thread 3077588736 :
> "org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown - The name
> org.kde.nepomuk.services.nepomukstorage was not provided by any .service
> files"*. And on shutting down the /NepomukServer/ the
> /nepomukservicestub/ would /always/ crash. But these errors are
> consistent as they appear both before and after the patch. :-)
> 
> Otherwise, the patch works fine. I'll do the rest during the weekend.
> 
> - Vishesh Handa
> 
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Aaron J. Seigo <aseigo at kde.org
> <mailto:aseigo at kde.org>> wrote:
> 
>     On March 26, 2010, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>     > (for the future please use the new nepomuk mailing list hosted at kde:
>     > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk)
> 
>     oops, sorry :)
> 
>     > I am aware of the necessary changes. And I would be happy, too if "one
>     > of the nepomukians will be willing". ;)
>     > In the end it will probably be me... I suppose I need tutoring when it
>     > comes to delegation of work... any takers? :P
> 
>     the good news is that it's really simple work, made simpler if you
>     know why
>     the service is being watched in the first place (so you can decide
>     whether to
>     stick with a serviceOwnerChanged signal, though from
>     QDBusServiceWatcher, or
>     to move to serviceRegistered and/or serviceUnregistered signals).
> 
>     so if someone is looking for an easy thing to do (or to get started
>     with) that
>     will have a real impact on performance, this is your chance :)
> 
>     --
>     Aaron J. Seigo
>     humru othro a kohnu se
>     GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
> 
>     KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
>     _______________________________________________
>     Nepomuk mailing list
>     Nepomuk at kde.org <mailto:Nepomuk at kde.org>
>     https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk


More information about the Nepomuk mailing list