[Nepomuk] Dolphin, nepomuk, trash:/

[Evgeny Egorochkin]

В сообщении от Среда 18 ноября 2009 22:46:31 автор Jamboarder написал:
> From: Evgeny Egorochkin
> 
> > > - Should files
> > > emptied from the trash or shift-deleted have their resources deleted
> > > from nepomuk?  I'm thinking yes, since the nepomuk wouldn't be littered
> > > with files that no longer exist.  I just wonder if there might be some
> > > semantic data (download history?) that's useful even after a file is
> > > deleted.
> >
> > This isn't as straightforward.
> >
> > If user deletes an mp3 file, it does make sense to stop storing technical
> > data such as bitrate or duration. However if the user tags the song as
> > "utter s*", it makes sense to keep the rating + artist, title etc.
> >
> > Thus if the user encounters the song later, he instantly knows to not
> > touch it.
> 
> Ahhh, so is it perhaps reasonable for me to use the following behavior as a
>  guideline?
> 
> - When the file gets deleted, the semantics of the content(Information
> Element?) may persist but the semantics of how it is
> stored(DataObject?) go away.

The best way to know if something is accessible is if it has nie:url assigned. 
Only valid nie:urls are supposed to be present in the store. Hopefully this 
will actually be so in near future :)