newer version tests

Scarlett Clark sgclarkkde at gmail.com
Tue Dec 5 14:58:32 UTC 2017


Ok, I understand now. I will look at the code.
Thanks,
Scarlett

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Harald Sitter <sitter at kde.org> wrote:

> Perhaps I wasn't very clear. "Riddell does not use it I'd not trust
> that it behaves as expected since the introduction of LTS though."
> what I meant is to say: "do not use it unless you've made absolutely
> sure that it actually works the way we do want it to work; i.e. read
> the code and possibly fix it up."
>
> To that end when reading the code you'll note that aptly doesn't run
> unless you define a type which I suppose is why it didn't delete
> anything (you used it wrong), and as a follow up I'll point out that
> the way the type skip works it isn't going to work "as expected" for
> xenial&bionic and neither does it work for release&release-lts as in
> each case it will match all rather than either-or I'd say.
>
> `   next unless options.types.include?(repo.Name)`
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Scarlett Clark <sgclarkkde at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Update:
> >
> > Sadly these are still failing the version test. Despite no errors on
> > expunge.rb I fear the APTLY part is not working.
> > There is no output to debug with. Any ideas on how to debug this? Or how
> do
> > I manually use aptly to remove these.
> > Thanks!
> > Scarlett
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Harald Sitter <sitter at kde.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, I mean, as the error says the problem wasn't with gems but the
> >> server disliking the request. So, I doubt the outdatedness has to do
> >> with it more than the whatever was wrong on the server resolved itself
> >> somehow.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Scarlett Clark <sgclarkkde at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Nevermind, my gems were out of date. expunge works fine.
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Scarlett
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Scarlett Clark <sgclarkkde at gmail.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> [scarlett at scarlett-neon pangea-tooling (master)]$ ruby
> >> >> ci-tooling/nci/expunge.rb mustache-d
> >> >> I, [2017-11-28T21:45:35.273959 #22691]  INFO --
> >> >> ci-tooling/nci/expunge.rb:
> >> >> JENKINS
> >> >> I, [2017-11-28T21:45:37.566977 #22691]  INFO --
> >> >> ci-tooling/nci/expunge.rb:
> >> >> -- deleting :: xenial_release-lts_forks_mustache-d --
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> /home/scarlett/.rbenv/versions/2.4.1/lib/ruby/gems/
> 2.4.0/gems/jenkins_api_client-1.5.3/lib/jenkins_api_client/
> client.rb:791:in
> >> >> `handle_exception': Internal Server Error. Perhaps the in-memory
> >> >> configuration Jenkins is different from the disk configuration.
> Please
> >> >> try
> >> >> to reload the configuration
> >> >> (JenkinsApi::Exceptions::InternalServerError)
> >> >> from
> >> >>
> >> >> /home/scarlett/.rbenv/versions/2.4.1/lib/ruby/gems/
> 2.4.0/gems/jenkins_api_client-1.5.3/lib/jenkins_api_client/
> client.rb:407:in
> >> >> `api_post_request'
> >> >> from
> >> >>
> >> >> /home/scarlett/.rbenv/versions/2.4.1/lib/ruby/gems/
> 2.4.0/gems/jenkins_api_client-1.5.3/lib/jenkins_api_client/job.rb:487:in
> >> >> `delete'
> >> >> from ci-tooling/nci/expunge.rb:83:in `block in <main>'
> >> >> from ci-tooling/nci/expunge.rb:75:in `each'
> >> >> from ci-tooling/nci/expunge.rb:75:in `<main>'
> >> >>
> >> >> No such luck on expunge.rb
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Harald Sitter <sitter at kde.org>
> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I am sure Riddell does it by hand, I always used expunge.rb, seeing
> as
> >> >>> Riddell does not use it I'd not trust that it behaves as expected
> >> >>> since the introduction of LTS though.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Scarlett Clark
> >> >>> <sgclarkkde at gmail.com>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > Hi,
> >> >>> > I am trying to work on these. I removed mustache-d  ( newer
> version
> >> >>> > in
> >> >>> > xenial-backports in archive) fork repo, and deleted jobs, but it
> is
> >> >>> > still
> >> >>> > failing.
> >> >>> > The error mentions remove from aptly, so my question is... how
> does
> >> >>> > one
> >> >>> > do
> >> >>> > that?
> >> >>> > Thanks,
> >> >>> > Scarlett
> >> >>> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/neon/attachments/20171205/c1464e0d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the neon mailing list