HOWTO qt app without ministro

[Sjoerd van Leent Werk]

Willy, BogDan,

As a deployer for professional applications, I would be very happy too. 
I believe the need exists for this just to use Ministro as backend 
service through a nice Java interface.

Sjoerd

On 11/19/2012 08:46 AM, Willy Gardiol wrote:
>
> The necessity to be linked to Google Play is stopping me too as i 
> deploy a lot on Amazon Market.
>
> I am sking to BogDan, would it be possible to migrate Ministro inside 
> the Qt app so that the libraries can be downloaded automatically 
> anyway? I mean, no need to go to the google play and install anything, 
> make ministro part of each Qt app, so the user will not be confused 
> and will just see the downloa bar automatically?
>
> This would solve all the user interaction issues i guess.
>
> The issue woul probably be where to store the downloaed libs so that 
> they are available to all Qt apps...
>
>
>
> Il 18.11.2012 22:54 Marcio Andrey Oliveira ha scritto:
>> I second Mixxer and Ray Chan.
>>
>> Static link should be available for those developers that want to use
>> it instead of shared library.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> 2012/11/18 Ray Chan <ray.chen.i.am.raychen at gmail.com [1]>
>>
>>> I agreed with Mixxer.
>>> First I do respect Necessitas a lot.
>>> And when I try to deploy my app in the market, I found that a lot of
>>> devices dont support Google Play. This means there is no way for
>>> user to get qt libraries from Ministro.
>>> The only way for me is to deliver a single apk which has all
>>> necessary qt-libraries included.
>>>
>>> Ray
>>>
>>> 在
>>>
>> 2012年11月11日星期日UTC+8上午1时24分26秒，mixxer写道：
>>>
>>>> Ok, thanks for replying. Dont mistake my argument for disrespect,
>>>> I really do appreciate the hard work that everybody involved is
>>>> putting into this.
>>>>
>>>> I would just like to clarify that I am not proposing that
>>>> everybody should mod and build their own DLLs. Most of your
>>>> arguments (LGPL, thing about updating and development etc) would
>>>> be valid on that basis but do not really apply to my suggestion.
>>>>
>>>> I am only proposing an additional deployment option for necessitas
>>>> DLLs - to be included in the APK as they are. The reasons are
>>>> clear enough from my previous message and as far as I can see they
>>>> remain valid. User experience being top of the list.
>>>>
>>>> In any case, I take your point about doing it myself. Ill see what
>>>> I can do, but must admit this is not my area of expertise.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>
>>  --
>> PLAY FREE
>>
>> GET FREE GAMES FOR
>>
>>  [2] [3]
>>
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] mailto:ray.chen.i.am.raychen at gmail.com
>> [2] http://plicatibu.com/mkand0
>> [3] http://plicatibu.com/mkbb0
>