[Marble-devel] Review Request: Render License/Copyright into the copied/printed map

[Torsten Rahn]

> On Dec. 8, 2012, 11:04 a.m., Dennis Nienhüser wrote:
> > data/maps/earth/openstreetmap/openstreetmap.dgml, line 5
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107620/diff/5/?file=97569#file97569line5>
> >
> >     After the license change OSM also wants "You must also make it clear that the data is available under the Open Database License, and if using our map tiles, that the cartography is licensed as CC-BY-SA.".
> >     See http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright/en
> 
> Torsten Rahn wrote:
>     Hm, so how do we keep our short credits then? "© OpenStreetMap contributors, ODBL/CC by-SA". That is actually pretty much way too long for use in mainstream media and covers way too much screen estate if you want to create a "free" 600x400 pixel map. It will either become small enough to be illegible or people will just ignore this mess of words (yay, mission accomplished in both cases). Or it will gently "force" publishers to not use the map at all or to do the credits in the way they figure it's alright.
>     
>     I wonder whether for the printed or even both versions we shouldn't provide the credits / license _below_ the map.
>     
>     Another question is whether we should allow for html links in the short license OR long license OR floatitem
>     
>     The most laughable aspect about this nuisance is the sentence: "For a browsable electronic map, the credit should appear in the corner of the map. For example: [screenshot]
>     Now to see that in action just go to www.openstreetmap.org. It's stuff like this that makes me sometimes wish there was a public domain street map. 
>

I think they would have done themselves a favor if they would have suggested the commonly found: (c) OSM - CC-BY-SA  or (c) OSM.org, CC-BY-SA 
Easy recognition, simple enough to be read, easy to place - and surely will not raise less awareness about the involved legal requirements than the "proper" attribution that is harder to read and harder to understand.
 


- Torsten


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107620/#review23152
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 8, 2012, 5:52 a.m., Illya Kovalevskyy wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107620/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 8, 2012, 5:52 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Marble.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Task was solved according to the statements:
>  1. https://google-melange.appspot.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/8015212
>  2. http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/8006226
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   data/maps/earth/bluemarble/bluemarble.dgml 5eb6e2b 
>   data/maps/earth/citylights/citylights.dgml 8db9b13 
>   data/maps/earth/openstreetmap/openstreetmap.dgml b26e5e1 
>   data/maps/earth/plain/plain.dgml e27eda2 
>   data/maps/earth/temp-july/temp-july.dgml e8372df 
>   src/ControlView.cpp 55d56f5 
>   src/QtMainWindow.cpp ae34e7c 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107620/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Built, run and tested on Ubuntu Linux 12.10 (Qt 4.8.3; Intel)
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> Marble Copyright Issues
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107620/s/885/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Illya Kovalevskyy
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/marble-devel/attachments/20121208/ada53463/attachment.html>