How can i make kate behaviour go back to normal?

Ingo Klöcker kloecker at kde.org
Sun Dec 11 11:16:50 GMT 2022


[Please reply inline instead of TOFU. It makes following an argument much 
easier and it makes it much easier to remove irrelevant context from a reply.]

On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2022 11:58:03 CET Waqar Ahmed wrote:
> Can you explain why this is worse UX?

Not using a separate dialog isn't a viable solution for many KDE applications. 
By making Kate differ from other applications you confront the users with 
different concepts which is against KDE's goal to present a common user 
experience across all applications (unless there are good reasons to derive 
from the common UX).

> This is an improvement, as it allows you to change settings without
> reopening the dialog every time.

This could have been solved easily by making the settings dialog not-modal 
(like in Kleopatra and probably many other applications).

> It also makes tweaking the theme and
> editor settings a lot more pleasant which was just a crappy experience in
> the past.

I'm wondering what this has to do with the settings being presented in a 
dialog or embedded in the main window.

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kwrite-devel/attachments/20221211/8f11a305/attachment.sig>


More information about the KWrite-Devel mailing list