[Ktechlab-devel] Zoltan strikes again. =P
P Zoltan
zoltan.padrah at gmail.com
Sat Oct 17 10:35:34 UTC 2009
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:04:26 +0200, Alan Grimes <agrimes at speakeasy.net>
wrote:
>
> However, I can't say I'm happy that my comment in ~ElectronicConnector
> was ignored. You are expected to try all kinds of configurations on your
> local machine. However, zoltan comitted code that uncommented code that
> I had commented out for a very good reason, -- it segfaulted!!! =(
>
It it's not commented out, we have the nasty bug of not really removing
connectors. It didn't segfalulted there for me (yet?). Instead I have lots
of invalid reads all over the place ( CircuitICNDocument::joinConnectors,
ItemDocument::~ItemDocument, ItemDocument::unregisterUID ). I guess the
document data sructures should be documented, and cleaned up; this
includes the crash on close in 0.3.7
Testcase: create a logic in and a logic out, connect them. By changing
logic in's value, logic out's changes too. Now delete the connector and
change logic in again. The logic out will change its value, even if it
shouldn't.
What should we do about this? Leave the bug in or let it crash? Neighter
is a good idea...
> The real problem is that QT's spooky signaling system is failing us by
> not communicating the "numPinsChanged" signal to our slot (from
> ECNode::setNumPins). =( Fix that and you should be able to change the
> number of pins on buss-splitters all day long without problems.
Hmm... there are some issues with resizing connected buses -- like
ktechlab crashing :(
Do you have more details about this?
>
> I wish I understood better how this signal and slot business works so I
> could explain in much starker terms why it's so brain-damaged. =P
>
Well, it's documented:
http://doc.trolltech.com/3.3/signalsandslots.html
Maybe a "connect" is missing somewhere ?
More information about the Ktechlab-devel
mailing list