[Ktechlab-devel] About KTechLab section

Michael T. mickljosapth at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 21:28:40 UTC 2009


     I know my opinion may not matter much here. But if it were I, I would
leave the names of those that originally invented the program.  Either for
just legacy reason or perhaps down the line they want to come back (who
knows). But it should in my view be under former maintainers / developers
for now.

+ 1



On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Juan De Vincenzo
<juandevincenzo at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> As I discussed with Julian and Alan over IRC yesterday, I'll be
> working on a modification that I can actually do, which is updating
> the names in the about section, that's why I would like to request the
> complete list of names that should be in there. It would be great if
> it includes the role for each one. =)
>
> I've been also thinking that, of course, David Saxton and and Daniel
> Clarke should be left there, but under a tag which I thought could be
> something like "Original Development", while the current team could be
> identified as the "Currently Active Developers/Team".
>
> Let me know your thoughts/seggestions about this.
>
> Regards,
> Juan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco,
> CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the
> Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source
> participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code:
> SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Ktechlab-devel mailing list
> Ktechlab-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/ktechlab-devel/attachments/20090219/74adea86/attachment.html>


More information about the Ktechlab-devel mailing list