WIP: Code refactoring unifying capture initialization

[Wolfgang Reissenberger]

OK, good idea. I will go through the code and document the core ideas there. As soon as I’m finished with it, I will remove the WIP flag.

Nevertheless, I would be more than happy if somebody else tests my changes in the mean time.

Cheers
Wolfgang

> Am 05.06.2020 um 08:44 schrieb Jasem Mutlaq <mutlaqja at ikarustech.com>:
> 
> Hello Wolfgang,
> 
> So if you performed extensive testing on this and documented your changes, I'll check if it can be merged. From what I learned, it's only going to be really tested by users once it lands in nightlies. So we have the option to revert if it breaks any workflows.
> 
> --
> Best Regards,
> Jasem Mutlaq
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:17 PM Wolfgang Reissenberger <sterne-jaeger at t-online.de <mailto:sterne-jaeger at t-online.de>> wrote:
> Hi Eric and Jasem,
> I’m not so sure how to proceed with https://invent.kde.org/education/kstars/-/merge_requests/9 <https://invent.kde.org/education/kstars/-/merge_requests/9> . Do we wait for others to test it before removing the WIP status? Or is it up to me to remove the status?
> 
> From my perspective, it looks good. I had it running at night with mixed conditions, meridian flip, guiding, focusing, clouds passing by, and everything went as expected.
> 
> All the best
> Wolfgang
> —
> Wolfgang Reissenberger
> 
> www.sterne-jaeger.de <http://www.sterne-jaeger.de/>
> TSA-120 + FSQ-85 | Avalon Linear + M-zero | Moravian G2-8300 + ASI 1600mm pro + ASI 294mc pro
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kstars-devel/attachments/20200605/311fad83/attachment-0001.htm>