Importing the Washington Double Stars Catalog

Christian Dersch lupinix at mailbox.org
Mon Dec 5 09:46:23 UTC 2016


Hi folks,

I think we have to crossmatch WDS with Tycho-2 and/or USNO (which one
btw?). Crossmatches can be done on identifiers (if both catalogs ship
identifiers of one common catalog) or on position. A very easy to go
solution is http://cdsxmatch.u-strasbg.fr/xmatch but using more powerful
tools like Topcat or PyVO (be sure to use latest version) allows you to
select columns from both catalogs, doing inner and outer joins using
ADQL (astronomy relatex SQL dialect) and TAP services. For example we
could create a Tycho-2 with just an WDS identifier in addition in that
way. Or a WDS with Tycho-2 identifiers in addition. Or any other
combination of both tables.

Btw: Almost all catalogs (notable exception: Steinicke NGC) are availabe
on VizieR: http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR

Greetings,
Christian


On 12/05/2016 09:56 AM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> So I'd like to make the WDS as an addon
> catalog: http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/astrometry/optical-IR-prod/wds/WDS
>
> Note that I have problems accessing the website, I can only see the
> main page but any links within timeout.
>
> So what would be the best way to go on about this? The stars are
> "named", and a lot them are duplicates of either the static
> named/unnamed stars, or Tycho-2/USNO stars. So what are the
> recommended solution?
>
> 1. Import them as is "new stars" and ignore duplication. We need
> metadata for angular separation and position angle, and magnitudes of
> 1st and 2nd components.
> 2. "Extend" static/tycho/usno stars with the cross-reference
> information provided by WDS? We might miss some stars that are not
> found in either of those catalogs, highly unlikely, but possible.
>
> In either case, we need to extend the "metadata".
>
> On another note, I was checking  DeepStarComponent::loadStaticStars()
> and found that after each record read, it checks if it is 16 or 32
> bytes. Can you mix 16/32 bytes within a single file?? If not, then no
> need to perform such a check after each record unnecessarily.
>
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Jasem Mutlaq
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kstars-devel/attachments/20161205/307e75f9/attachment.html>


More information about the Kstars-devel mailing list