[Kstars-devel] Re: branches/kstars/carbonix/kstars

[Akarsh Simha]

> > Oh cool. If it is in usable state (no regressions etc), why don't you
> > merge it into trunk right away and continue additional work on the
> > branch?
> The branch needs work, trunk needs work, I'm afraid that merging it in
> trunk will get a lot of work which needs to be done in steps. I would
> like to work us to work more with code reviews on the trunk,
> especially if we decide to get the three parts split.
> 
> I'm just trying to avoid getting a trunk with a lot of fixing needed.

Okay, sure. Makes sense.

> > Also, I think we should restart discussions with Stellarium team about
> > how they manage data. I just looked at some old threads and one of the
> > topics we were talking about there is a relational database. I think
> > we should let them know that we have this, and see if they want to use
> > it. If we all migrate our data into a common database, that would be
> > very good. What do you think Victor?
> I'm not sure about telling them to use our data, but it would be great
> to have a discussion about creating a common database resource for
> celestial objects!

Okay.

Regards
Akarsh