[Kstars-devel] Re: kdeedu/libkdeedu [POSSIBLY UNSAFE]
Dominique Devriese
dominique.devriese at student.kuleuven.ac.be
Sun Apr 18 20:49:54 CEST 2004
Jason Harris writes:
> On Sunday 18 April 2004 11:14 am, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>> K, I see. Maybe you can ask TrollTech whether you can redistribute
>> it under the LGPL, or perhaps they might accept your code in Qt
>> itself ? Or perhaps you could replace the GPL code ?
>>
> An alternative might be to redo these classes as actual inherited
> subclasses of the Qt counterparts, rather than cut-n-paste rewrites:
> class ExtDate : public QDate {
> ...
> };
True.
> That's how many KDE classes with Qt counterparts (KLineEdit,
> KMainWindow, etc) are done. Definitely more elegant, and it would
> allow for the LGPL. (Actually, it's an interesting question to ask
> whether KMainWindow constitutes a "derived work" of QMainWindow. It
> definitelty hooks into the Qt API, and clearly classes like
> KMainWindow would be useless without Qt. So I guess I don't
> understand how KMainWindow can be LGPL'd,
Yeah, I agree.
> but if they can do it that way, I suppose we can too.).
Indeed.
cheers
domi
More information about the Kstars-devel
mailing list