[Kst] Re: kst
netterfield at astro.utoronto.ca
Fri Feb 18 21:33:47 CET 2011
I think we should still keep the ability to install side-by-side for a
Three options I can think of:
kst1, for kst 1.x, kst for kst2.x
kst1 for kst 1.x, kst2 for kst2.x, and a link to kst.
kst for kst1.x and kst2 for kst2.x (current)
Any opinions from the list as to which would be preferable?
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Matthew D Truch <matt at truch.net> wrote:
> As the official fedora kst packager, I want to be lazy and not have to
> deal with the two branches of kst. My current plan is to keep kst 1.x
> as the version on all released versions of Fedora, but starting with the
> next version to be released (in like a couple months, Fedora 15) have
> kst 2.x instead.
> Is this appropriate, or do you not see the 2.x series as the replacement
> yet? Also, what about the name. Is the binary going to stick with
> kst2, or will at some point in the near future it switch to being kst?
> At that point, I guess kst 1.x could have the binary be called kst1.
> There is certainly more precident for that in the Linux world. Just
> "No matter where you go, there you are."
> Matthew Truch
> Department of Physics and Astronomy
> University of Pennsylvania
> matt at truch.net
C. Barth Netterfield
University of Toronto
More information about the Kst