[Kst] kst2 and kst 1.x/port

[Peter Kümmel]

Barth Netterfield wrote:
> Andrew felt that that kst1.x compatible scripting in kst2 would be very hard - 
> perhaps even harder than the 1.x straight port, and would leave us with a 
> worse product than a 'from scratch' scripting paradigm for kst2.

What's the difference between scripting in kst1 and kst2?
Kst2 uses QtScript, and kst1? Couldn't the support of kst1 scripts
be simply done by another binding to the new kst2 classes?

When support of kst1 scripting is such important it's maybe worth the
effort, especially when it focuses all developers onto trunk/kst2.

Peter