[Kst] Ports ? Or Qt-only builds ?
netterfield at physics.utoronto.ca
Tue Nov 11 19:02:20 CET 2008
On November 11, 2008, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> That sounds great. Will it be 'just Qt' (plus of course gsl, cfitsio,
> netcdf, ... for plugins) ?
> I.e. do you good re-create Qwt-style functionality, or will you use Qwt?
We don't use qtw (in fact kst predates qtw). Evaluating how well
provide 'qtw' funtionality is left as an exercise for the user :-)
More information about the Kst