[Kst] Image data type
staikos at kde.org
Thu Jul 22 22:05:17 CEST 2004
On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:51, Barth Netterfield wrote:
> Great. Before too much gets written, does anyone have any comments on the
> class arrangement? George?
> Thinking more about (B) (which is not happening today)
> Tri-linear interpolated makes sense for under-resolved maps, but may or may
> not make sense for over-resolved maps. Then we *may* want to bin over a
> pixel rather than tri-linear interpolate to pixel centres.
> This implies that we may have more kstArray sub-classes, like a
> kstBinnedArray. Basically going down the kstEquationCurve, kstPSDCurve,
> kstHScurve path.
I don't see anything wrong with that approach at this time, but it would
really help to see a rough implementation or proof-of-concept. As long as
everything is relatively self-contained, inherits from the base classes, and
follows the same design philosophy as the other classes (which it seems to)
for consistency purposes, I think it will be fine.
KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/
More information about the Kst