[Kst] kst on amd linux 64
netterfield at astro.utoronto.ca
Fri Nov 21 17:37:23 CET 2003
On November 21, 2003 11:00 am, Ted Kisner wrote:
> > But why would it come back with nothing... hmmm....
> This sounds like the infamous "not all fields listed in the format file are
> present" bug. I forget if someone fixed this recently...
> Simon-- Are all the fields listed in the format file actually present in
> the directory? If not, this is likely the problem.
The first one listed in the 'format' file is the one that is needed.
> > Ted: I looked at your getdata - looks great. My only question is weather
> > we want to compile in putdata...
> Not sure, will kst every need to write dirfile format files?
Perhaps, but I think that we want to move to the new .mdt style format for
written files before we add writing - the big problem with PutData is that it
doesn't (and perhaps shouldn't) modify 'format'
> Also note that in my version of GetNFrames, the function call expects the
> name of the field you want information about (since different fields can
> have differing numbers of frames).
There is an architectual issue here in kst - DataSources don't know what you
are going to read from them.... We may change this. (I think we need to...)
More information about the Kst