[Kroupware] postfix-20030930 needs fsl >= 1.2

[Thomas Lotterer]

On Fri, Nov 14, 2003, Uwe Heinrich wrote:

> Hi,
> I got the following error:
> bash-2.05b$ rpm -ba postfix.spec --define 'with_sasl yes' --define 'with_tls
> yes' --define 'with_ldap yes'
> error: failed build dependencies:
>         fsl >= 1.2.0 is needed by postfix-2.0.13-20030930
> bash-2.05b$ ls /kolab/RPM/PKG/f*
>  /kolab/RPM/PKG/fsl-1.1.0-20030522.ix86-linux2.4-kol.rpm
> 
postfix-2.0.13-20031028 contains a fix which is related to the fsl
architecture, see http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=13048

postfix-2.0.13-20031017 introduces fsl "monitor" feature and requires
fsl >= 1.3.0

postfix-2.0.13-20030714 and later introduce fsl "append" option and
require fsl >= 1.2.0

See 1yr timeline for postfix package at
http://cvs.openpkg.org/timeline?x=1&c=2&dm=1&d=365&px=openpkg-src/postfix

> In the testing directory I can only find fsl-1.1.0.
> 
> Does anybody know where to find the correct version?
> 
latest release from OPENPKG_1_3_SOLID
ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.3/UPD/fsl-1.3.0-1.3.2.src.rpm

latest release from OPENPKG_CURRENT
ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/fsl-1.4a1-20031028.src.rpm
This is an alpha release but no problems known so far. Move to
beta currently deferred as it doesn't compile on Debian/Alpha (CPU
architecture).

> Or: Is it possible to use a non-rpm version, e.g. fsl-1.2.1.tar.gz from
> Distribution: ftp://ftp.ossp.org/pkg/lib/fsl/
> and: is there anything special to obey?
> 
Uwe,
as OSSP and OpenPKG is basically run by the same people you can expect
that OpenPKG packaging is only seconds behind OSSP code releases :-)
This is especially true for fsl which is an OSSP application created for
OpenPKG.

--
Thomas.Lotterer at cw.com, Cable & Wireless