[Kroupware] HOWTO: amavisd-new, spam assassin, sophos
Ivaylo Toshev
ivo at linux.itce.com
Tue Jul 22 12:15:01 CEST 2003
In my humble opinion, the right way to do SMTP filtering, access-control
and eventually load-balancing is to use SMTP Relay Gateway. So, for
example:
[INTERNET] <-> [ Firewall with SMTP Relay] -> [DMZ with KOLAB Server]
And if one use this schema , then he can use Sendmail as SMTP Relay +
MailScanner.
На ?, 2003-07-21 в 18:58, Jon Bendtsen записа:
> Jason A. Pattie wrote:
> > It is more efficient and safer than having the MTA delivering through
> > SMTP/LMTP, like amavisd does. Mailscanner does not want to be an MTA.
> > It reads a file, processes it, and only deletes it from the incoming
> > queue after it successfully writes it to the outgoing queue. This way
> > it never loses an e-mail. Since it is not involved in the getting or
> > sending of the e-mails, it cannot lose e-mail that way, either. It
> > supports more MTAs than amavisd does.
> >
> > Setting up MailScanner is easier because you don't have to configure the
> > MTA to know about MailScanner. You don't have to touch any
> > configuration files for your MTA to use MailScanner. MailScanner takes
> > care of starting the instances it needs. Also, you don't have to
> > reconfigure your delivery agent. As long as you don't have your MTA
> > starting automatically, MailScanner takes care of properly starting the
> > incoming and outgoing MTA instances using command line arguments to
> > configure them.
>
> This sounds much more like how i want it done. Does the default
> MailScanner documentation work for the kolab postfix ?
>
>
>
> JonB
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kroupware mailing list
> Kroupware at mail.kde.org
> http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kroupware
More information about the Kroupware
mailing list