Libraries

[CARVALHO Luis Passos]

Hmmm. Since we don't have documentation and it's not fully stable, we should disable it. The only thing I hate more than a missing feature is a feature that doesn't always work.

Maybe add a undocumented option to the config file saying if the library code is active or not, just so we can test it easily and provide previews for those who like bleeding edge?

Regards,
Luis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leon Pennington [mailto:leon at leonscape.co.uk]
> Sent: terça-feira, 13 de Julho de 2004 20:17
> To: KPovDevel
> Subject: Libraries
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Okay I've committed some further changes to the library handling. Theres
> still
> some rough edges, and its not all I would of hoped, I've been trying
> numerous
> approaches and things, and still can't get it to work perfectly. Its
> usable,
> just some graphical glitches, and occacsionally refuses to do things that
> it
> should allow. I've simply run out of time...
> 
> So should I leave the drag and drop code active? or should we even disable
> libs altogether till it all works?
> 
> I'm tempted to leave it all in, since it would add a very useful feature
> to
> KPM, but if we diable the libs, we could then change its internal working
> later without worrying about breaking any libs people have created. Plus
> we
> get to take advantage of any improvments KDE/Qt 4 may bring.
> 
> What does everyone think?
> 
> --
> Leon Pennington
> 
> "If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day; if you
> teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime."
> 
> List archive and information:
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kpovmodeler-devel