[KPhotoAlbum] [PATCH] make grid around images optional

[Jan Kundrát]

Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> #Thumbnail / cell size
> And I also think that most images people take are landscape

A quick statistics based on three independent sets of data: users have 
between 0.4% and 16% of portrait images :).

> it would be great if the photo 'cell' in the thumbnail view could
> adapt to this and wouldn't be that high: the 'thumbnail size' could
> define actually the width (w) of the cell and then all images would be
> scaled to fit to area thats w px wide and 0.66*w px high (to match 2:3
> proportions). Of course some would like to be able to customize this,
> but if one was able to manuallly define the portrait of 'a default
> photo', that would help to save a lot of space in the thumbnail view.

To retain existing flexibility, I'd change "thumbnail size" to two items:
a) maximal dimension that the table cell can occupy
b) aspect ratio (1:1, 3:2, 4:3, 16:9, 2:3, 3:4, 9:16)

I'm a bit worried if that doesn't cross that border "oh this is so 
customizable that we can't use that anymore" :).

Cheers,
-jkt