[Konversation-devel] [Bug 174143] [patch] Reconnect fails on password protected channels

[Nach]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174143





--- Comment #23 from Nach <NachMS gmail com>  2009-06-19 18:31:09 ---
Hi Travis, commit looks good.
I never knew tabs were drag-able around with the middle click, it's the last
thing that would come to my mind. Instead I've been right clicking on them
using the move left/right feature. Which I don't see appearing in version 4.
Unless of course that also is an issue of running it from the wrong directory,
which I'll have to look into.


>KDE applications - and by the way, this includes Konversation 1.1 - need to be
installed into /usr or a prefix covered by $KDEDIR/$KDEDIRS/$KDEHOME so they
can locate their data when run. This includes their menu structure, which is
stored in an XML file, and, in Konversation's case, nicklist icon themes. The
file menu in the KDE 4 version is identical to that of Konversation 1.1, and
the same nicklist icon themes continue to be available, although the default
has changed to the "Oxygen" one (first included with v1.1) for better KDE 4
integration.

Okay, I will look into that when I get a chance. None of that was obvious to
me.
I do quite a bit of programming with Qt 4, and I don't have menus disappear in
my personal programs when run from the "wrong" location.

>Moving tabs still works exactly as in Konversation 1.1 as well: With either the
regular tab bar or the listview version of the tab bar you can drag tabs around
using middle-mouse, or you can use the actions found in the tab/listview item
context menu, or the (same) actions found in the "Window" menu, or the keyboard
shortcuts associated with those actions (which can be changed via "Configure
Shortcuts..." in the "Settings" menu).

I saw no right click context menu in my test, but I will try again.

>The bottom line is, you appear to have been disingenuous when you claimed to
have figured out how to build and take a look at the KDE 4 version

No I wasn't, as I did indeed build it to test it, and took a look at it to make
sure it worked. I may not have had the best experience, my fault it seems, but
I did do what seemed to be the most obvious at the time. There was nothing
disingenuous about it.


>you claimed to possess the ability to make an accurate assessment of whether
the SVN code achieves feature parity with the stable release

I have made no such claim. All I can tell is what looks missing to me. I really
have no idea about Konversation in a larger picture, I know I haven't seen even
5% of what Konversation can really do.


>Please don't go around calling people liars when you don't know what you're
doing. Thanks.
I never called you a liar, I called the statement disingenuous, please don't
confuse the two. And thanks for working on Konversation, good job on porting
it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.