[Konsole-devel] Review Request 108461: Make libKonq optional
Kurt Hindenburg
kurt.hindenburg at gmail.com
Sun Jan 20 15:59:37 UTC 2013
> On Jan. 20, 2013, 12:51 p.m., Francesco Cecconi wrote:
> > is it not more simple to use a "option" macro ?
> >
> > option(KONSOLE_BUILD_LIBKONQ "Support for..." ON)
> >
> > if (KONSOLE_BUILD_LIBKONQ)
> > find_package(LibKonq)
> > macro_log_feature(LIBKONQ_FOUND "LibKonq" "libkonq is a construction kit for a file manager. It comes from kde-baseapps." "http://www.kde.org" TRUE)
> > endif (KONSOLE_BUILD_LIBKONQ)
I'll try that - from what I gather macro_optional_find_package actually uses OPTION - however I didn't see how to set a default
- Kurt
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108461/#review25838
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 19, 2013, 5:13 a.m., Kurt Hindenburg wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108461/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 19, 2013, 5:13 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Konsole.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> I meant to do this earlier - this change allows konsole to build w/o libKonq - I've come across system w/o the libKonq installed. You look the dnd menus w/o libKonq.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/CMakeLists.txt 7829e13
> src/TerminalDisplay.cpp a2c5621
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108461/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kurt Hindenburg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/konsole-devel/attachments/20130120/711a1299/attachment.html>
More information about the konsole-devel
mailing list