Closing bugs as fixed (in master) what version for "fixed in" ?

[Thomas Baumgart]

On Montag, 6. Februar 2023 22:43:05 CET Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote:

> I think there has been (and will be) more than one bug which has been  
> closed as "RESOLVED FIXED" but it is fixed only in master, and not  
> likely or not possible to backport to 5.1.x.  I'd love to be able to  
> put a "Fixed in" version in those bugs, but not sure what to use.  I  
> don't think 6.0 would be appropriate, as I would only use that number  
> for a version totally and exclusively for Qt 6.  Is 5.2 reasonable, or  
> is there a reason to just not use a version number in such cases.

I think we can use 5.2 as a label for FIXED-IN. Even if we name the
next release completely different (we started to discuss options a while
ago but never came to a conclusion AFAIR) we can draw a list from b.k.o
to report them.

Guess we have to visit those that have been closed lately and mark them
as such.

Opinions?

Thomas


-- 

Regards

Thomas Baumgart

-------------------------------------------------------------
Sometimes you will never know the value of a moment,
until it becomes a memory. (Dr. Seuss)
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 868 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20230207/5bb90e52/attachment.sig>