Master Branch Status
Jack
ostroffjh at users.sourceforge.net
Sun Nov 27 21:26:55 GMT 2022
Check the content of the libalkimia-dev package for alkversion.h. It
might be in an unexpected location. My libalkimia 8.1.1 has it in
/usr/include/alkimia/Qt5/alkimia/alkversion.h. However, it looks like
KMM requires libalkimia > 5.0, so you should be ok in terms of version.
(sorry for the other resend. I has sent this from the wrong address
and then resent that one thinking I was fixing this one.)
On 11/27/22 15:51, Brendan Coupe via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
> qtkeychain-qt5.x86_64 was installed.
>
> qtkeychain-qt5-devel was not installed. It is now.
>
> That fixed that problem.
>
> Then it failed at 15%:
>
> ==============================================
>
> [ 15%] Building CXX object
> kmymoney/mymoney/CMakeFiles/kmm_mymoney.dir/mymoneytransactionfilter.cpp.o
> /usr/local/src/kmm/kmymoney-2022.11.27-13.44.21-GIT-MASTER/kmymoney/mymoney/mymoneymoney.cpp:20:10:
> fatal error: alkimia/alkversion.h: No such file or directory
> 20 | #include <alkimia/alkversion.h>
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> compilation terminated.
>
> ==============================================
>
> dnf list installed | grep alkimia
> libalkimia-doc.noarch 8.0.3-6.fc35 @fedora
> libalkimia-qt5.x86_64 8.0.3-9.fc37 @fedora
> ibalkimia-qt5-devel.x86_64 8.0.3-9.fc37 @fedora
>
>
> *Brendan Coupe*
> *3 at Coupe7.com*
>
>
> On 2022-11-27 1:09 PM, Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>> Check for a package for qt5-keychain, perhaps qt5keychain-dev. The
>> Fedora package name might be different.
>>
>> On 2022.11.27 14:55, Brendan Coupe via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>> I just upgraded to Fedora 37. The 5.1 branch compiles without a
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> When I try to compile the Master branch I get the following error
>>> (I did a test compile before the upgrade to Fedora 37 which seemed
>>> to work fine. I never installed it / ran it so I can't be sure it
>>> would run).
>>>
>>> CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:141 (find_package):
>>> Could not find a package configuration file provided by
>>> "Qt5Keychain" with
>>> any of the following names:
>>>
>>> Qt5KeychainConfig.cmake
>>> qt5keychain-config.cmake
>>>
>>> Add the installation prefix of "Qt5Keychain" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH
>>> or set
>>> "Qt5Keychain_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above
>>> files. If
>>> "Qt5Keychain" provides a separate development package or SDK, be
>>> sure it
>>> has been installed.
>>>
>>> **
>>> *Brendan Coupe*
>>> *3 at Coupe7.com*
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/14/22 2:57 PM, Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>>> On 2022.11.14 07:25, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>>>> On Samstag, 12. November 2022 16:48:15 CET Jack via
>>>>> KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>>>> > On 11/12/22 09:27, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>>>> > > [snip ...]
>>>>> >
>>>>>> What's the best way to report these issues? I've put some in
>>>>>> Issue 61 in invent.kde.org and sent some to the mailing list. Do
>>>>>> we want to broaden that issue to track all bugs in master, or
>>>>>> keep that to Ledger related issues and open a separate issue for
>>>>>> other bugs?
>>>>>
>>>>> My preference would be to use separate issues for areas, e.g.
>>>>> ledger, home page (which we both already have) and others. Not
>>>>> sure what we can do if someone adds a b.k.o entry that rather
>>>>> fits an issue on invent. Maybe close it on b.k.o and keep a
>>>>> reference to it in the issue.
>>>>
>>>> I know of issue 61 for ledger issues. Issues 16 and 18 (New home
>>>> screen and New Welcome Page) are more about how things should look
>>>> that tracking issues with what has already been implemented in
>>>> master. So, I don't see any issue for other areas of master
>>>> development, although I agree that would be a good way to handle
>>>> this. Should I start by creating a new issue "New issues with
>>>> master branch" which can be for anything that doesn't fit other
>>>> issues, and then create new issues of specific areas that have
>>>> more than one item in the general issue?
More information about the KMyMoney-devel
mailing list