Merge request to discuss incomplete features?

[Thomas Baumgart]

Alex,

On Samstag, 20. Februar 2021 16:22:45 CET Alexander Maret-Huskinson wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> is it ok to create a MR for an incomplete feature? I have some issues I 
> would like to discuss.

Yes.

> As mentioned in an earlier e-mail, I'm currently working on a Docker 
> image which can build the AppImage.
> 
> So far, I got it to a point where it builds the dependencies, but it 
> cannot build KMyMoney yet. It seems some of the dependencies on the 
> master branch have changed and need to be updated first.
> 
> I also have some other issues where I had to change the cmake 
> configuration in a way, that is most likely not a good idea. I would 
> like to create a MR to make changes visible and better be able to 
> discuss these issues. Obviously the PR should not be merged yet, it is 
> only there for discussion. Would this be ok? I have seen there are some 
> draft MRs already.

Starting the title with 'Draft:' apparently removes the merge button from the MR
and is the way to go for your case. The keyword used to be WIP but has been
changed at some point in time.

-- 

Regards

Thomas Baumgart

https://www.signal.org/       Signal, the better WhatsApp
-------------------------------------------------------------
I hear what I say so that I know what I think -- unknown source
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 868 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20210220/bfaca238/attachment.sig>