[Kmymoney-devel] Review Request: Refactoring of matching a transaction-under-import

Łukasz Maszczyński lukasz at maszczynski.net
Mon Dec 10 16:19:51 UTC 2012

2012/12/10 Thomas Baumgart <thb at net-bembel.de>:
> Hi all,
> On Sunday 09 December 2012 09:32:01 Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
>> I don't have the final word on this, but my vote is against adding boost as
>> a dependency. At least, until a real benefit for the application is shown.
> I second Alvaro's opinion on this one. I am not against Boost or any other
> library per se, but we should see a clear benefit for the user (not the
> developer) while adding a dependency to some other library.

Hi all,

agreed. I think boost would be beneficial in many more areas of kmm
than this particular one, but I also agree with you that it's not
worth introducing now - when its benefits aren't that specific, while
the cost is. I may get back to this topic someday :)

I replaced optional with pointers in the newest revision. Please have
a final check whether it's ready to be shipped.


More information about the KMyMoney-devel mailing list