[Kmymoney-devel] Review Request: Refactoring of matching a transaction-under-import

Thomas Baumgart thb at net-bembel.de
Mon Dec 10 15:24:50 UTC 2012

Hi all,

On Sunday 09 December 2012 09:32:01 Alvaro Soliverez wrote:

> Every dependency we bring into KMyMoney has a clear set of features and
> benefits for the application (libGMP, libofx, aqbanking, etc.). In this
> case, I only see a limited value for the developers. And it seems to me,
> this  could be done the Qt way. Maybe the other way is more clear, but the
> only real benefit is readability. Perhaps maintainability, but that's
> offset by adding a new dependency.
> I don't have the final word on this, but my vote is against adding boost as
> a dependency. At least, until a real benefit for the application is shown.

I second Alvaro's opinion on this one. I am not against Boost or any other 
library per se, but we should see a clear benefit for the user (not the 
developer) while adding a dependency to some other library.

Unless we would safe hundreds of lines of code by using another lib ....



Thomas Baumgart

GPG-FP: E55E D592 F45F 116B 8429   4F99 9C59 DB40 B75D D3BA
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent
life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 225 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20121210/c2f5aead/attachment.sig>

More information about the KMyMoney-devel mailing list