[Kmymoney-devel] refactoring private members of KMymoneyApp
Alvaro Soliverez
asoliverez at gmail.com
Mon Sep 21 22:26:18 CEST 2009
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Cristian Oneţ <onet.cristian at gmail.com>wrote:
> În data de Duminică 20 Septembrie 2009 18:48:51 Thomas Baumgart a scris:
> > Hi,
> >
> > on Sunday 20 September 2009 Cristian Oneţ wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Has anyone something against moving all the private members of
> > > KMyMoneyApp into the Private struct from the cpp thus removing a lot of
> > > included headers from kmymoney2.h an possibly improving the global
> build
> > > time?
> >
> > Not me.
> >
> Than it's done in SVN.
>
> Another matther of coding style would be the different ways of writing the
> includes. For example:
>
> #include <QApplication>
> and
> #include <kapplication.h>
>
> Right now we have both ways. I would prefer sticking to one of these two
> styles but which one? I would vote for the second. Any toughts on this?
>
This is the link referred by Krazy about the includes:
http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Library_Code_Policy#Getting_.23includes_right
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20090921/b33a80d3/attachment.htm
More information about the KMyMoney-devel
mailing list