<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Cristian Oneţ <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:onet.cristian@gmail.com">onet.cristian@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
În data de Duminică 20 Septembrie 2009 18:48:51 Thomas Baumgart a scris:<br>
<div class="im">> Hi,<br>
><br>
> on Sunday 20 September 2009 Cristian Oneţ wrote:<br>
> > Hi,<br>
> ><br>
> > Has anyone something against moving all the private members of<br>
> > KMyMoneyApp into the Private struct from the cpp thus removing a lot of<br>
> > included headers from kmymoney2.h an possibly improving the global build<br>
> > time?<br>
><br>
> Not me.<br>
><br>
</div>Than it's done in SVN.<br>
<br>
Another matther of coding style would be the different ways of writing the<br>
includes. For example:<br>
<br>
#include <QApplication><br>
and<br>
#include <kapplication.h><br>
<br>
Right now we have both ways. I would prefer sticking to one of these two<br>
styles but which one? I would vote for the second. Any toughts on this?<br></blockquote></div><br><br>This is the link referred by Krazy about the includes: <a href="http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Library_Code_Policy#Getting_.23includes_right">http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Library_Code_Policy#Getting_.23includes_right</a><br>
<br><br>