[Kmymoney-devel] Current status and issues for a release

Cristian Oneţ onet.cristian at gmail.com
Fri Nov 13 11:45:25 CET 2009


On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Alvaro Soliverez <asoliverez at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Cristian Oneţ <onet.cristian at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Alvaro Soliverez <asoliverez at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > to change the version number to 3.95 (which would be the official
>> >> > version
>> >> > number for the release)
>> >> Do we really need to go that high with the version number. I would
>> >> suggest adopting 1.2 for the KDE4 ported version. I say this because I
>> >> don't think there will be more than one release on the KDE3 branch (so
>> >> that could be 1.1). Once the KDE4 version is done we should really let
>> >> go of the <1.2 branch. We should stick with the kmymoney version
>> >> scheme so there is no need to jump to 3.95.
>> >
>> > The idea is to bump the final version number to 4, that's why.
>> OK, I'm going to insist a bit on this. Why is the final version going
>> to be bumped to 4? Why shouldn't we continue using KMyMoney versions
>> (in a continuous way)? I see no reason to bump to version 4 unless we
>> adopt the KDE4 release schedule but the it should be 4.4 doesn't it?
>>
> I don't remember when we had this discussion, but the version number has
> been 3.95 for some time already. Check the about box, that's why I took as a
> fact that the beta version is going to be 3.95. We mentioned it when talking
> about keeping the name and dropping the '2', or at least I think so.
I remember that Thomas committed this version number but I don't know
why he had chosen 3.95 maybe he can shed a bit of light on this.

> I think we should be adjusting to a KDE release schedule, but we are going
> to have a couple of versions before that. So, whenever the time comes to
> release together with KDE, we drop our own version number and use KDE's
> (4.5, 4.6 at the time?).
Looking back at KMyMoney's release cycle wouldn't the KDE release
cycle be a bit short for the speed of development?


More information about the KMyMoney-devel mailing list