[Kmymoney-devel] restoring QWidget::updatesEnabled property

[Alvaro Soliverez]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Cristian Oneţ <onet.cristian at gmail.com>wrote:

> În data de Duminică 26 Iulie 2009 15:53:56 Alvaro Soliverez a scris:
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Cristian Oneţ
> <onet.cristian at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > În data de Sîmbătă 25 Iulie 2009 15:10:03 Alvaro Soliverez a scris:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Cristian Oneţ
> > >
> > > <onet.cristian at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > În data de Sîmbătă 25 Iulie 2009 11:15:55 ați scris:
> > > > > > În data de Sîmbătă 25 Iulie 2009 10:01:12 ați scris:
> > > > > > This is why I think that trying to restore the flag does not work
> > > > > > for the transaction form unless we have some call to explicitly
> > > > > > enable
> > >
> > > the
> > >
> > > > > updates
> > > > >
> > > > > > like we do for the register.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or we could do the disable/restore stuff only if we really need it,
> > >
> > > that
> > >
> > > > > is,
> > > > > when updates are not already disabled when reaching that code.
> > > >
> > > > I can't remember which class it was right now, but I remember there
> was
> > > > a point in the code where it would call setEnabled for each tab. It
> was
> > > > commented out and added #warning #Port to KDE4.
> > >
> > > Do you mean the setEnabled call from TabBar::copyTabs? That code has
> been
> > > ported and it does not help with this issue. But I think that the fact
> > > that a
> > > widget is enabled/disabled and the fact that the updates for the widget
> > > are enabled/disabled are unrelated.
> > >
> > > My mistake. It's been a while since I have looked at that code.
> >
> > Perhaps the Qt3 code relied on the fact that the transaction form would
> be
> > enabled anyway even if explicitly disabling the updates, but in Qt4 that
> > has to be done by hand.
> >
> > Is it enough to just enable the updates explicitly or another widget is
> > being disabled in addition to the transaction form?
> It is enough to explicitly enable the updates but I would prefer
> disabling/restoring the updates in the transaction form only if that is
> needed
> (when they are not already disabled). That way when the updates on the
> parent
> widget are re-enabled they will also be re-enabled on the transaction form.
>
>
Can you emit a signal and connect it to a slot that will setUpdatesEnabled
to true?
That might do it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20090726/fb9b912f/attachment.htm