Fwd: kdebase/kate/app
Christoph Cullmann
cullmann at babylon2k.de
Thu Apr 21 14:31:10 CEST 2005
On Thursday 21 April 2005 00:04, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > The questions are here:
> > 1) do we want other modes that IDEA?
>
> debatable
and questionable ;) given that a IDEA style mdi is already complex, a mode
switching support brings this complexity to new stages, like kmdi shows ;)
not that it is not doable, but given how much time we all have for
maintainance ...
>
> > 2) do we want docked/undocked toolviews?
>
> yes
would be nice, in deed, but for kate no killer feature we MUST have
>
> > 3) do we need 4-th border toolview (topmost)?
>
> debatable
nice to have, as it is just plain easy to have 4 sidebars if you support 3,
mean, hey, that's just some lines ;)
>
> > 4) do we need to have several widgets inside one toolview
> > (splitted horisontaly or vertically)?
>
> yes
yes, too ;)
>
> > 5) do we need splitted views in the main areas?
>
> yes
nice to have, no killer feature for me, as kate does it itself already since
years ;)
--
Christoph Cullmann
KDE Developer, kde.org Maintainance Team
http://www.babylon2k.de, cullmann at kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmdi-devel/attachments/20050421/d54cc4a3/attachment.pgp
More information about the Kmdi-devel
mailing list