Fwd: follow up from our talk / responce to your paper
Stanislav Karchebny
berk at upnet.ru
Fri Feb 4 12:18:55 CET 2005
On Friday 04 February 2005 02:52, Scott Wheeler wrote:
> Just serving as a metadata cache would be (a) really slow and (b) not
> really useful for much, especially not to the queryable graph type stuff
> that's the essence of the klink idea.
Yeh, thats why i threw it out already.
>
> You might want to have a look at some of the stuff in kdenonbeta/klink --
> the DESIGN document is outdated, but should give you an idea on how some of
> the thoughts evolved.
I'm grepping my way thru it.
Btw, I have my own document where i tried to collect my ideas on what
relations should exist and how they should be handled. If i succeed in
converting it to new KOffice format, I'll translate it to english and post. I
started writing it before I even knew about klink so it would be interesting
to see how much similarities are there.
--
keep in touch. berkus.
Roey on #kde-devel: when I hear best of breed I tune out--it's too much a
buzzword. What I carry between my legs is best of breed. And like KDE, just
because it's less visible doesn't mean it gets less usage.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/klink/attachments/20050204/5310484c/attachment.pgp
More information about the Klink
mailing list