Future of the animation feature

[Timothée Giet]

Le 20/12/2014 19:58, Dmitry Kazakov a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>     Well, I'm not really happy with this solution, because we'd need
>     to have an animation layer for every kind of layer, except for the
>     group layer. (A file layer needs to switch to a different file
>     along the timeline as well as a paint layer, a filter layer needs
>     a different config along the timeline). I think it would also
>     complicate the bookkeeping of what is shown in which cell/frame.
>
>
> We can define requirements in the following way:
>
> 1) Only Paint Layer can be animated.
> 2) Other types of layers will be static.
>
> That would cover most of the usecases. Though, yes, it is disputable.

That would be really much better to have all kinds of layers (and masks) 
animated.
Only group layers should be static, as changing group content over time 
would not be so useful and probably add useless complexity.


>
> If we want to switch paint devices for every type of layer, we can 
> just you the "strategies" approach I was talking before. The one that 
> is used for wraparound mode.
>
>
> -- 
> Dmitry Kazakov
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Krita mailing list
> kimageshop at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20141220/4e24326b/attachment-0001.html>