Some input about current Krita Windows build

[Sven Langkamp]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:16 PM, David Revoy <davidrevoy at gmail.com> wrote:

> * mockup : http://i.imgur.com/NMzgAhY.png*
>>
>>
> Thanks for your time commenting @Animtim, here my replies on this topic :
>
>
>> *-The preset selector row is really important for me, very useful to
>> compare/check several presets quickly. I would not be happy if it gets
>> removed. (by the way, I'm really missing the option to see only presets
>> from selected engine here as it was before, I filed a bug about this some
>> time ago).
>> *
>
> Ok. I have difficulties using this carousel brush selector with a stylus,
> so I never do. With new tag system mini-bug-or-feature ;newly created brush
> just jump to the end of list. The scrolling holding '>' arrow is really
> long.
> Restricting presets by active brush engine on this carousel selector would
> make a lot of sens. For your and my usage.
>
>

If we remove it someone will request to add it back soon. We could add an
option to hide it maybe. At some point the restriction to only the the
active brush was removed from all preset widgets, not sure why though.


> ** *
>> -Having the engine selector as dropdown would make one more click  and
>> scrolling the list to switch.. I still prefer how it is now.
>> *
>
> Ok, I thought about it because I rarely switch engine when I configure a
> brush.  Anyway, my drop-down list in a drop-down panel was surely not
> elegant.
> By the way, does the subcategory 'Stable' and 'Experimental' brush engine
> still makes sens ? I have the feeling any brush engine available now are
> stable.
>

Experimental is a bit useless. Originally it was there to show that these
brush engines might change in the future. But I think we never really
communicated that and they didn't change that much either.


> * -Name field shrinked: that's ok as long as it's still long enough
>> (looks ok size on the mockup)
>> *
>
> :-)
>
>
>> * -Do we really need to add a rename preset when we can already just
>> edit the name and save it as new? Well yes, as then we have to clean up
>> manually old-named presets, so it could save some manipulations here.. So
>> why not, if we find space for it.
>> *
>
> Rename would be a nice little featurette. Because sorting is driven by 0-9
> + A-Z ;  Renaming by creating a new and removing the old one is sure what I
> do since years. But it's also always risky to remove accidentally the
> unwanted one. Here again the "mini-bug-or-feature ;newly created brush just
> jump to the end of list" prevent a bit of that. I would really like a way
> to refresh resource without having to close and restart Krita...
>
>
>> * -Color field folded be default: why not, as those options are used on
>> very few preset cases.
>> *
>
> :)
>
> * -Restore icon button: yep sure this one still miss a proper icon, it's
>> on the todo list ;)*
>
> My idea on the mockup was not to provide a static icon. But draw here the
> 'active' icon . Easier feedback.
>

The problem there is that not every image can be scaled down properly. So
you could get some problem with very fine structures etc.


> _____________________
> http://www.davidrevoy.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Timothée Giet <animtim at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Le 26/09/2013 09:38, David Revoy a écrit :
>>
>>  5) "Edit Brush Settings" dialog doesn't fit the wide-format laptop
>>> screen (I guess it was a 15" laptop).
>>>
>> A diet mockup proposition I made this morning for the "Krita Brush
>> Editor" :  http://i.imgur.com/NMzgAhY.png  ( 950x450px instead of
>> 1115x600px ).To other artist and users feel free to debate about this
>> mockup here before submitting as a wish. Would you like it ?
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> Some opinions about this mockup:
>> -The preset selector row is really important for me, very useful to
>> compare/check several presets quickly. I would not be happy if it gets
>> removed. (by the way, I'm really missing the option to see only presets
>> from selected engine here as it was before, I filed a bug about this some
>> time ago).
>>
>> -Having the engine selector as dropdown would make one more click  and
>> scrolling the list to switch.. I still prefer how it is now.
>>
>> -Name field shrinked: that's ok as long as it's still long enough (looks
>> ok size on the mockup)
>>
>> -Do we really need to add a rename preset when we can already just edit
>> the name and save it as new? Well yes, as then we have to clean up manually
>> old-named presets, so it could save some manipulations here.. So why not,
>> if we find space for it.
>>
>> -Color field folded be default: why not, as those options are used on
>> very few preset cases.
>>
>> -Restore icon button: yep sure this one still miss a proper icon, it's on
>> the todo list ;)
>>
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>   - David
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Krita mailing listkimageshop at kde.orghttps://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Krita mailing list
>> kimageshop at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Krita mailing list
> kimageshop at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20130926/6692ce77/attachment-0001.html>