My Blog Data and need your ideas on Sketchbook Tagging - sri13

[Silvio Heinrich]

On 06/28/2011 09:45 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 Jun, శ్రీ కాంత్ తియ్యగూర wrote:
>> Hi Boud,
>> In this regard, I need your ideas about the sketch book tagging like how it
>> should it look like and its functionality . . .
> Tet's take this discussion to the mailing list. Either you are amazingly fast, or Qt makes it much easier to implement tagging since it took the gimp guy a whole summer of code... I still think we need optional saving of the tags to nepomuk, though, not just the gimp xml file.
>
> The sketchbook part was never sufficiently specified, I think, so we have a chance to go in depth here. This is what was in the plan:
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> III. Sketch Book Tagging Ideas:
>
>         People tend to work in various projects and the resources related to one project vary from one another. In these cases, Sketchbook tagging helps to change profiles i.e. set of resources easily. Sketchbook tagging is something like loading a profile, where all the tools and resources that belong to the profile tag is updated and set to have higher priority among resources.
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> So... Right now we've got tagging, adding and removing of all types of resources done, right? And Silvio is working on a kind of image browser where you can collect images, sketches and reference images together. That needs to support our tagging interface as well.
>
> Next up is to make it easy to collect all resources, images and reference images in a kind of project, we can use the tagging system for that. A kind of master tag selector. Maybe we can integrate that with the workspace system Sven has made? Then a work space can be associated with a set of tags, and those tags are used as the default filter for all resources?
>

It would be cool if you could tag  and search for reference images using 
krita.
But if he wants to use nepomuk it maybe would be wise to not make the 
nepomuk
stuff a hard dependency (we should be able to compile krita without 
nepomuk).
... I still haven't surrendered in hoping for a lightweight windows 
version of krita without
an enormous dependency tree :)