boud at valdyas.org
Tue Jun 7 13:51:11 CEST 2011
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 Jun, Silvio Heinrich wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 10:43 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> >> If you disable the opacity setting in the preset editor, I find it only
> >> logical to disable the opacity slider in the toolbar.
> >> If you disable the option, you cannot change the opacity anyway... why
> >> should you be able to move the slider then?
> >> And why should the slider enable the opacity setting? If you disabled it
> >> in the first place you don't want to change the opacity
> >> anyway. If you want to change the opacity again you can simply turn on
> >> the option.... no?
> > Well, I'm not convinced -- this is maybe something that should be tested by more people, but I think that we'll get a lot of bug reports if people select a preset but cannot change the opacity. I think the preset should set the default opacity, but not lock it.
> > But we'd need input from other people here.
> Then maybe we just should make the opacity option not checkable.
> We wouldn't have this problem anymore and I actually don't see a reason
> why the user should
> disable the opacity anyway. The user can just max out the opacity.
Sounds like a good plan to me.
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org
More information about the kimageshop