Krita 2.4 on Windows: pros and cons

[Silvio Grosso]

Hi everyone,

Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> I think that our first target group of windows users are those curious and
> experimental enough to even have heard of Krita

Sure!

As already pointed out previously, the "trick" is to explain that Krita 2.4
on Windows is *very* experimental.
NOT yet ready for a professional use.

As the old saying goes: "Humility is the mother of all vertues" ;-)

P.s: in my view, the other big error to avoid is to expect patches from
Windows users :-)

Best regards,

Silvio



Bugzilla from boud at valdyas.org wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday 20 July 2011 Jul, silvio grosso wrote:
>> In my  view, maybe, the perfect way to go to Windows is the "Blender way"
>> You release your software for free on Windows but "in exchange" you try
>> to get the most from it (in essence money...).
>> I know it is a bit "hard" to swallow
> 
> Oh, no -- I'm perfectly fine with any (legal) way of getting Windows users
> to send money our way. But I think that our first target group of windows
> users isn't the majority of windows users, but rather those users that are
> curious and experimental enough to even have heard of Krita. It'll be some
> time before computer magazines (if they still exist? haven't checked for
> quite some time) package krita on their cover cd's.
> 
> -- 
> Boudewijn Rempt
> http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl
> _______________________________________________
> kimageshop mailing list
> kimageshop at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Krita-2.4-on-Windows%3A-pros-and-cons-tp32098546p32101390.html
Sent from the kimageshop mailing list archive at Nabble.com.