State of the release

[Sven Langkamp]

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 5:54 PM, LukasT.dev at gmail.com
<lukast.dev at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Friday 24 September 2010 15:50:12 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Friday 24 September 2010, LukasT.dev at gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Really Big Issues
> > >
> > > Let me also add bug issue regarding brush engines preset.
> > > Enkithan suggested a long ago that we should mark brush engines
> > > that are experimental (e.g. brush preset format is changing radically
> > > between versions)
> > > as experimental and stable as stable (e.g. development of the Pixel
> brush
> > > is quite conservative, so that one might be marked as stable)
> > >
> > > We are in a string freeze. How do we want to solve this problem?
> >
> > I think a short reprieve of the string freeze and changing the name to
> > curve (experimental) is okay if you do it today.
>
> I did not manage to do that on Friday. What about adding one more string
> called "Experimental" in the Combo box as category and sort the brush
> engines
> first according the group (stale before experimental) then according the
> name?
>
> I can schedule this on Tuesday. Maybe ask translators if they allow this?
> It is huge problem if we don't do this and changing string for every brush
> engine seems quite more problematic (and long names does not look good
> in the combo box then)
>
> Opinions?
>

I think the best way to solve that is to use categories like the composite
ops. This would require a bit more work, but it doesn't make the combobox
bigger and only adds one string.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20100926/b9af04d7/attachment.htm