boud at valdyas.org
Tue Oct 5 13:19:56 CEST 2010
On Tuesday 05 October 2010, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> On tisdag 05 oktober 2010, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 October 2010, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> > > On tisdag 05 oktober 2010, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > > * the lcms2 module?
> > >
> > > why ?
> > If krita is less table with lcms2 than with lcms1, we probably shouldn't
> > tempt distributions. Maybe marking it as experimental is sufficient, but
> > we've already had questions about it before.
> Sure if it is less stable... but is it ? I am using it, and I don't get any
> crashes from it, or broken things. I think I have ironed out all known
That's way cool! Then I can reinstall lcms2 as well :-)
> > > > * compilation against unreleased versions of opengtl?
> > >
> > > well, we might as well do it for any library...
> > In this case we know that krita will compile fine but crash, right? So
> > that's a bit scary.
> Yes on the other hand, no distribution goes to the trouble of using opengtl
> from mercurial. They usually upgrade when either Krita stops supporting older
> version, or when llvm is upgraded, but then they will get a released version.
> And anyway, I am going to fix the crash really soon :)
> And on the other hand, it makes testing harder for us, the current development
> version of opengtl is going to be released before 2.4, meaning that we will
> have to make sure that krita 2.3 works with it.
Okay, that makes sense.
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org
Ceterum censeo lapsum particulorum probae delendum esse
More information about the kimageshop