Yet another bug. This time filters vs selections

[Matthew Woehlke]

Dmitry Kazakov wrote:
> Again. That is a binary transparency iteration that is not good itself. We
> need a full-featured transparency with 256 levels of transparency.

At risk of a dumb question, something I am wondering from this and the 
other recent thread (embedded transparency)... why 256 levels? That's 
fine for 8-bits/channel color spaces, but will selection and masks never 
support 16-bit?

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
You're on your own for the pony. -- Richard Hughes, on feature requests