Yet another bug. This time filters vs selections

[Dmitry Kazakov]

> On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Dmitry Kazakov wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > It seems to me that filters do not pay any attention to the
> > *selection*parameter passed to them. They simply ignore it (at least i
> > can say so for colors filters).
>
> It doesn't happen with all filters, but it's a known issue that we still
> have
> regressions in our filters compared to 1.6. There is a unittest that tests
> the
> output of all filters, but it takes a long time to run and so is mostly
> disabled.
>

Ideally, we should free filters from doing this dirty work. Selections
should be our internal routine... Ideally...
Another question - how to implement it?



-- 
Dmitry Kazakov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20090909/01ffb597/attachment.htm